Rezun biography

But too much they talk about him, you have to participate in a conversation. And here's what I say: Rezun -Suvorov is not a historian, but a talented publicist, he has a gift to convince, there is a style of presentation of thoughts, sometimes delusional. If you have already read his books, then carefully translate and the work of help A. highly recommend.

Relieves all the illusions regarding the constructions of Rezun as a historian. He graduated from the Kharkov Tank School. Consciously moved to the west. The main works: “aquarium”, “liberator”, “icebreaker”, “day-m”, “control”, “last republic: why the Soviet Union lost the Second World War”, “choice”, “purification” and others. The historical and literary work of S.

in the context of the Funding S. The dignity of this approach, based on the achievements of psychojotia, social logic, content analysis, interpretation programs, programs of interpretation, programs ETC texts, it is fair to believe the possibility of an adequate analysis of the course of the historical process in the conditions of irrevocable implemented meaningfully and purposefully eliminating most significant archival documents.

The result of thinking and the historical and literary work of S. in the context of the existence of mutually exclusive assessments of the historical creativity of S. Gritsanov, O. Gritsanov The latest philosophical dictionary. Gritsanov A. Minsk, professional intelligence officer, GRU officer, military historian, writer. Born near Vladivostok in the family of a soldier; Ukrainian.

He graduated from the Kalinin Suvorov military and Kiev Higher Combined Arms Command School. He was an officer of the intelligence department of the headquarters of the military district. From G. in the city of four, he worked in the GRU General Resenture. In absentia sentenced to death. Suvorov is the author of books on military-historical topics, including the study “Soviet military intelligence” Suvorov V.

Soviet Military Intelligence. London, Suvorov’s book “Icebreaker. Who started the Second World War? The Nefhtantastic Document ”M. in the preface to the book of Suvorov, in particular, writes:“ The Second World War is a term that the Communists taught us to write with a small letter. And I write this term with a capital letter and prove that the Soviet Union is its main culprit and the main instigator.

The Soviet Union is a participant in the Second World War from the year, from its very first day. The epigraph to the book took the words of Stalin: “The West with his imperialist cannibals turned into a focus of darkness and slavery. The task is to break this hearth to the joy and comfort of the workers of all countries. ” Suvorov claims that Stalin was preparing an offensive war against Germany and that the Soviet attack “Thunderstorm” was planned on July 6.

The author proceeds from the fact that the main goal of the foreign policy of the Bolshevik leadership of the country and G. was developed to unfinfect the Second World War, which would destroy Europe, facilitating its “Sovietization”. Declaring the connection of the idea of ​​the world revolution with the new World War, Suvorov relies in his evidence on Lenin's work. However, Moscow needed a political leader whom it could use to incite a war in Europe.

Hitler, according to Suvorov, became such a person, created and brought to power with the help of Stalin. In addition to a war -widow Germany, there would be Britain in Europe that did not have a powerful land army; France, which spent almost its entire budget on a purely defensive program, raising the likeness of the Great Chinese wall along its borders, 2 and other warmer and more economic and economic terms of the country.

Such Europe would not have been so fire hazardous, but for some purpose, Stalin does not spare funds, effort and time to revive the German shock power, see the fascist sword in the USSR. Against whom? Of course, not against yourself. The answer is one: against the rest of Europe ”V. Suvorov, using the expansionist aspirations of Germany, Stalin in every possible way contributed to the exacerbation of the international situation in Europe and the outcome of the war.

Suvorov claims that the Communists "Hitler's hands unleashed a war in Europe and prepared a sudden blow to Hitler himself to capture Europe destroyed by him." Hence the simple conclusion: the Soviet Union is the main instigator and culprit of the war. The version of Suvorov about Hitler - the "icebreaker of the revolution", which will undermine the capitalist system and at the right time will be defeated by the Red Army, many historians are adopted by bayonets.

Objectively recognizing the legitimacy of raising questions by Suvorov, a number of reviewers refuse him the right to his own version of the answers, qualifying it as a neo -fascist Mercyov A. Between two extremes, or who built an “icebreaker”?

Moreover, the blow is struck not according to the concept, but by the personality of the author - "not a historian, a traitor, an agent of foreign special services." The book itself is therefore perceived as a product of the dark forces standing behind him. Therefore, the conclusion is made: the work of Suvorov cannot claim scientificity, especially since the author refutes the “finally established truths”.Nevertheless, the meaning of the Soviet position was not to start the war this could lead to the formation of a single anti -Soviet front, but to use such a war in its interests.

The polemic around the book V. However, the version of Suvorov finds more and more supporters. Thus, the historian B. Sokolov writes: “In our opinion, as the vision of researchers given by V. Suvorov, and especially, and especially after the publication of the named book, the facts allow not only to agree with the conclusion of V. Suvorov, but also very thoroughly assuming that at first Stalin was going to attack Hitler even in the summer of G.

Truth about the Great Patriotic War. The scientist, in particular, argues that the world with Finland on March 16 is significant, that, according to A. Vasilevsky, in April, the work of his whole life. The plan was drawn up under the leadership of Zhukov Generals Vasilevsky and Vatutin. All formulations are simple, clear and unambiguous. Operation "Thunderstorm", or error in the third sign.

However, in our opinion, it is impossible to agree with the point of view of Suvorov to the Stalinist repressions against the command staff of the Red Army and foreign intelligence authorities. Enough evidence of documentary and memoirs that they sharply undermined the combat effectiveness of the Red Army. In addition, many heads of the military-industrial complex, the director of defense plants, scientists, and designers were affected by the repression.

One of the evidence supporting the Suvorov version is an open and not at all masked military psychosis in the media in the end of the mass media in the end of the x. Stalin and Stalin and Stalin and Stalin and Stalin and Stalin and Stalin The attack of Germany on the Soviet Union ”M. add that in G. Why did the Soviet Union lose the Second World War? Sinelnikov, in which, judging by advertising, serious archival materials that support the arguments of Suvorov are given.

Notes 1 in July G. Congress created the Military Department of the Comintern, which determined its task as follows: “By the very course of the historical revolutionary process, the working class will be forced to go to the attack when the Red Army, the main weapon of the working class, should be prepared in such a way as to fulfill its offensive mission on any section of the future front of this front of this front In the near future, they are determined by the limits of the entire continent of the Old World.

” Volkogonov is saying that the Soviet leadership set for himself a strategic goal of the “world proletarian revolution”, and Stalin’s thinking was the Kominternovsky Volkogonov D. Orlov believes that Stalin was a supporter of the Pan Slavism, A. Stalin believes that the thinking of Stalin ultimately became an ordinary imperial, no matter how it was hidden by Medzalov A. The Soviet generals were amazed: “Who would have thought that the Germans would only need a little more than two weeks to defeat the main forces of the French army” Sandals L.

Stalin made a program speech at a reception in the Kremlin in honor of graduates of military academies. In many ways, she echoed his speech on April 17, in addition, Stalin directly called Germany an aggressor, while in the fall of G. Stalin’s speech on May 5, back in G. In the years, the idea of ​​“export of revolution” is promoted by many poets and writers: P. Pavlenko, N. Shpanov, K.

Simonov, V.